October 25, 2024 - 14:00 to 15:20
Scarica Programma:
mercoledì 23 ottobre 2024 – ore 17:00
Scarica Programma:
mercoledì 23 ottobre 2024 – ore 10
Scarica Programma:
giovedì 15 giugno 2023 – ore 15
Scarica Programma:
José Gabriel Palma, Cambridge University
martedì 29 marzo 2022 – ore 17
Scarica Programma:
Professor André Nassif, Universidade Federal Fluminense
martedì 8 marzo 2022 – ore 15,15
Scarica Programma:
Professor Robert Wade, London School of Economics and Political Science
martedì 22 febbraio 2022 – ore 16
Scarica Programma:
Presso Facoltà di Economia “G. Fuà”, Università Politecnica delle Marche e Istao, Villa Favorita, Ancona 13 e 14 settembre 2019
| Ora: | Venerdì 13 settembre 2019 Facoltà di Economia, Sala del Consiglio – 3° piano, Piazzale Martelli 8, Ancona |
|---|---|
| 9:30 |
Presiede Paolo Pettenati (Univpm, Ancona e Past Presidente Istao) Cambiamento strutturale e disuguaglianze economiche nei paesi a sviluppo tardivo
|
| 14:00 |
Presiede Antonio Vazquez Barquero (Universidad Autonoma de Madrid) Il futuro dell’Unione Europea e dell’euro: proposte di riforma
|
| 16:30 |
Presiede Alessandro Sterlacchini (Univpm, Ancona) Politiche industriali di sviluppo
|
| Ora: | Sabato 14 settembre 2019 Istao, Sala dei Convegni, Villa Favorita, Via Zuccarini 15, Ancona |
|---|---|
| 9:30 |
Presiede: Pietro Marcolini, Presidente Istao La ricomposizione dello sviluppo territoriale nella fase della globalizzazione
|
Descargar:
Download:
Programa Workshop:
La lenta recuperación de la crisis financiera de 2008 y la creciente desigualdad en la distribución del ingreso están sacudiendo profundamente, en los países desarrollados, el consenso general sobre los beneficios de la globalización. El auge de los movimientos populistas clama por un retorno a las políticas proteccionistas. Ante la perspectiva de un cierre gradual de los mercados tradicionales de sus productos, la Unión Europea está considerando la posibilidad de nuevas alianzas estratégicas con otras áreas económicas.
En el Cono Sur, la desaceleración del crecimiento después del "ciclo de las materias primas" y el ascenso al poder de nuevos partidos políticos, están cambiando la actitud proteccionista de los países del Mercosur a favor de una mayor apertura hacia los mercados internacionales.
En este contexto es útil volver a examinar la evolución reciente de las relaciones entre Italia y Argentina, dos países unidos por lazos económicos y culturales profundos, y comenzar a pensar en las oportunidades de intensificación la cooperación entre los dos países y entre los dos bloques.
El taller será un espacio de reflexión y fomento de las posibilidades de intercambio. Se lleva a cabo como parte de las Jornadas del Cuia en Argentina en 2017, en cooperación con la Asociación de Economistas de una Lengua Neolatina (AENL).
Pavia, 24th and 25th April 2015
| Ora | Friday 24th April 2015 Aula Volta(Pavia University), Strada Nuova 65, Pavia |
|---|---|
| 9.30-9.40 |
Welcome Address
|
| 9.40-10.00 |
Alternative economic policies in Europe: an introduction
|
| 10.00-11.30 |
1st session The economic situation in lagged and Southern European countries
|
| 11.30-13.00 |
2nd session The German-South Europe divide and the changing interregional (but intraeuropean) trade
|
| 13.00-14.30 | Lunch |
| 14.30-16.00 |
3rd session The consequences of European economic policies on real economic variables and the public debt issue
|
| 14.30-16.00 |
4th session The need for an industrial policy in Europe
|
| Ora | Saturday 25th April 2015 Aula Goldoniana - Collegio Ghislieri, Piazza Ghislieri 5, Pavia |
|---|---|
| 9.30-10.30 |
5th session A modest proposal for resolving the Eurozone crisis Presentation of:
|
| 10.30-13.00 |
Economic restructuring in Europe
|
Download pdf (17th, 2015):
The Pavia Group’s April 2015 meeting took place against the background of a deepening European economic crisis.
The Eurozone crisis has many causes and culprits. However only its citizens are being asked to pay the burden of its costs, especially those in the European periphery. Austerity in Greece and other member states has been submitted to dictates from a Troika of the European Central Bank (ECB), European Commission and International Monetary Fund (IMF) and is contributing to massive hardship which prejudices the commitment of the Rome Treaty to rising standards of living and of its first revision in the Single European Ac to economic and social cohesion.
“Europe is not working” either in the sense of assuring high levels of employment or in terms of the commitment to democracy of its founders.
‘Structural reforms’ that induce austerity while reducing social protection cannot be the condition of any assistance to debt distressed countries. The IMF in its April 2015 World Economic Outlook recognizes that employment protection is not found to have any statistically significant negative effect on productivity. An obsession with reducing debt neglects that Europe could allocate surplus savings into productive investments especially because increased public investment raises output both in the short and long term, crowds in private investment, and reduces unemployment with limited effect on the public debt ratio, as supported by the IMF paper (written by A. Abiad, D. Furceri, and P. Topalova) of May 2015.
If the European Union is both to survive and flourish it needs to reassure its citizens that markets serve people rather than people serve markets, as well as that its institutions are working in their interest and adding value to what its member states otherwise cannot do as well by themselves. For some analysts this can only be achieved by new federal institutions, similar to those of the US. But Europe cannot wait for this. Without alternatives now it risks disintegration.
This is the main reason why this Declaration stresses feasible alternatives now. Europe already has the institutions and the decision-making procedures that could enable a recovery of investment and jobs. One of these is the European Investment Bank (EIB), whose lending for investments does not count on the debt of member states. Neither is there any need for national guarantees, for fiscal transfers, or for a “transfer union”, since EIB bonds are serviced from project finance.
Those governments that want a recovery in employment have the power to act through the procedure of ‘enhanced cooperation’, which does not require unanimity, and which could by-pass entrenched opposition by a few member states to a bond-funded investment-led European recovery.
Supply side measures that reduce labour costs neglect the resulting reduction in aggregate demand, while in contrast supply side investment programmes can create aggregate demand.
Investment creating demand was the basis of the success of the Roosevelt New Deal in the 1930s, whereas after the crisis of 2007-2008 many EU member states have committed themselves to balanced budgets. Since then, the risk of depression and persistent unemployment and poverty in key member states and many European regions has mainly been the consequence of European austerity policy, whereas in other world regions and large economies policies have been either investment-led (East Asia) or demand-led (the USA).
The current trends in Europe are decreasing the ratios of labour income and investment to GDP. As an outcome, the crucial missing variable is the lack of aggregate demand. This reflects a private sector investment that still is a sixth below its pre-crisis level.
In European documents there is often an excessive emphasis on export-led growth. But in a large market such as that of the EU, internal demand is often more important than external demand. EU member states trade mainly with themselves. The ratio of extra-European exports to GDP was lower than 10% before the economic crisis and the EU as a whole is broadly in balance with the rest of the world. There is, instead, a vast latent demand for social investments and employment and income generated by these, such as in health, education, urban regeneration and safeguarding the environment.
Great structural economic differences among European countries and regions already existed at the time when the single European currency was introduced. These could not have been eliminated by uniform financial rules in Europe. Such differences increased during the crisis, and backward regions need specific productive investment programs. Structural differences between European countries and regions cannot be eliminated by reducing wages in an attempt to increase price competitiveness, nor by low level Structural Funds. They need a rediscovery of industrial, innovation and regional policies that foster structural competitiveness.
Quantitative easing has been necessary, but it is not sufficient for European economic recovery. This has been recognised by Mario Draghi who has stressed that it is governments that need to act to promote an investment-led recovery. Although bond finance of European investment is ruled out for the ECB, it has been the basis of EIB investment funding since 1958. This can be the key to recovery.
The current crisis can be resolved without new financial institutions, without Treaty revisions, without fiscal transfers between member states and without national guarantees for bond-funded investments.
A “New Deal for Europe” is feasible through bond-financed social and environmental investments and development projects similar to the Roosevelt New Deal but not needing a fiscal union since bonds, as in the case of the EIB, can be serviced by revenues from national governments which will increase with a recovery of investment and employment.
Europe could and should recycle global surpluses. The BRICS made plain in Washington in September 2014 that they would invest in Eurobonds if the EU were to issue them to finance a recovery. Sovereign wealth funds – and pension funds – have vast surpluses for which they struggle to find adequate investment outlets.
There should be a major increase of direct European investment, based on borrowing from the EIB and its sister institution the European Investment Fund (EIF) with the under-recognised advantage that borrowing from them does not count on national debt. The proposal for a European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI) and to define investment criteria for this neglects that no new investment criteria are needed for a bond funded investment recovery since the criteria for the EIB already include Trans-European Transport and Communications Networks (the TENs) and support for small and medium firms as well as investments in health, education, urban regeneration, green technologies and protection of the environment (cf. Essen European Council, December 1994, and Amsterdam Special Action Programme of 1997).
There have been various proposals to mutualise national debt up to or in excess of the Maastricht debt limit of 60% of GDP. The proposal to do so above this level is subject to “moral hazard”, whereas doing so up to the 60% limit is not. This could readily be converted into “Union Bonds” which, like the Erblastentilgungsfond of the Federal Republic on German reunification, are not traded nor used to leverage financial derivatives and speculation. The interest to service such bonds would be the liability of national governments from direct and indirect fiscal receipts generated by the recovery of investment, employment and incomes and would not need fiscal transfers between them.
The “golden rule” principle that, over an economic cycle, a government will borrow only to invest, rather than to finance current spending, should be adopted in interpretation of the Stability Pact. This should exclude public investment and national and regional co-financing of European financed projects from the Stability Pact’s indicators.
An effective European Development Strategy was set out in the 1993 Delors White Paper on Growth, Competitiveness and Employment, which also proposed the European Investment Fund. Its vision of the future opportunities for European economy and society was unanimously endorsed by the Essen European Council of 1994 and needs to be recovered now. Bond finance from the EIB and EIF should enable synergies between research, development and restructuring of key sectors - green and alternative energy, green European transports, territory care, research on health, aerospace (as in the existing European Industrial Policy) - and should increase attention on the needs of European citizens. Public policy can help to extend, create and co-create markets and support business ecosystems and clusters, in mutually beneficial collaboration with the private sector, while respecting sustainability concerns, for the society and its own enlightened self interests.
There should be a resolution of insolvent banks through existing European procedures and institutions. The ECB and the European Stability Mechanism can restructure, recapitalise and resolve exposed banks on a case-by-case basis, without waiting for a fully-fledged Banking Union.
Existing financial resources at regional and local levels can be reinforced by issuing territorial and district bonds, creating stronger linkages between local financial resources and investment needs, and between collective share capital at local levels and support for management and worker buy-out initiatives through a regionalised European venture capital fund financed by European Investment Fund (EIF) and EIB bonds.
The capabilities of local and regional actors should be reinforced through local development projects funded by joint EIB-EIF European bond finance. This would enable a “resurgence” of local and regional capabilities, responding to community needs on the basis of public and social entrepreneurship and trans-regional and trans-national co-operation programmes, which have already been accepted in principle by the EU since the launch of the RECITE (Regions and Cities of Europe) programme in 1988.
With gains in direct and indirect fiscal receipts from recovery of employment and output, resources would be generated for a European Solidarity Programme to offset extreme poverty by guaranteeing a minimum European citizenship social standard. In the short term this could be funded from the interests accumulated within the European system of central banks (TARGET2 - Trans-European Automated Real-Time Gross Settlement Express Transfer System).
None of this excludes an increase of the European budget and a transition in due course towards European fiscal policy financed by the introduction of European carbon taxes, a Financial Transaction Tax, and a fair European tax on the profits of Multinational Enterprises or the harmonisation of European taxes on profits, avoiding fiscal competition among state members. But none of it depends on this. While support in due course for such a common fiscal policy would be reinforced by European governments showing that they can recover high levels of investment, employment, trade and wellbeing.
Bernadette Andreosso-O'Callaghan, Jean Monnet Chair of Economics, University of Limerick, Ireland
Giovanni Balcet, University of Turin, Italy
William Bartlett, European Institute, London School of Economics, UK
Carluccio Bianchi, University of Pavia, Italy
Patrizio Bianchi, University of Ferrara, Italy
Josep M. Bricall, Universitat de Barcelona (E).
Giuseppe Canullo, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Italy
Claude Courlet, Honorary President of the Pierre Mendès France University, Grenoble, France
Wolfram Elsner, Institute of Institutional & Innovation Economics, University of Bremen, Germany
Jacques Fontanel, Pierre Mendès France University, Grenoble, France
Gioacchino Garofoli, Insubria University, Italy
Andrea Ginzburg, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
Arne Heise, University of Hamburg, Germany
Stuart Holland, University of Coimbra (P) and ISES, University of Pannonia; Hungary
Carles Manera, University of the Balearic Islands, Universitat de les Illes Balears (E)
Ermelinda Meksi, Faculty of Economics, University of Tirana, Albania
Bernard Musyck, Frederick University, Cyprus
Ferran Navinés Badal, Direcció general d'Universitat i Recerca (DGUR), Govern de les Illes Balears (E)
Luigi Orsenigo, IUSS (Institute for Advanced Studies), Pavia,Italy
Henk Overbeek, VU University Amsterdam, Netherlands
Stephan Panther, University of Flensburg, Germany
Ioanna Sapfo Pepelasis, Athens University for Economics and Business, Greece
Paolo Pettenati, Honorary President of ISTAO and Vice President of AENL, Italy
Christos Pitelis, University of Bath and Queens' College, Cambridge, UK
Ivana Prica, Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, Serbia
José Reis, University of Coimbra, Portugal
Erik Swyngedouw, Manchester University, UK
Franz Tödtling, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Austria
Vittorio Valli, University of Turin, Italy
Robert H. Wade; London School of Economics, UK
Palma de Maiorca, 27-28 febbraio 2015
| Venerdì 27 febbraio | |
|---|---|
| Pomeriggio | |
|
|
| Sabato 28 febbraio | |
|---|---|
| 10:00 - 14:00 | |
|
|
3, 4 et 5 octobre 2013
| 1 jour | jeudi 3 octobre |
|---|---|
| 9.00-13.00 |
La nouvelle division internationale du travail; perspectives pour le développement
|
| 13.00-14.00 |
Buffet |
|
Les territoires et les systèmes productifs localisés au cœur des mutations économiques et sociales |
|
| 14.00-15.00 |
Ouverture du colloque
|
| 15.00-15.30 |
|
| 15.30-16.00 |
|
| 16.00-16.15 |
Pausa Caffè |
| 16.15-16.45 |
|
| 16.50-17.15 |
|
| 17.15-18.00 |
Débat avec la salle |
| 2 jour | vendredi 4 octobre |
|---|---|
| 9.00-12.00 |
Les territoires créatifs et l’avenir du développement local
|
| 10.00-10.15 |
Pausa Caffè |
| 10.15-10.45 |
Les systemes productifs localisés en Europe
|
| 12.00-13.30 |
déjeûner |
| 13.30-15.45 |
Les systemes productifs localisés en Europe (suite)
|
| 15.45-16.00 |
Pausa Caffè |
| 16.00-17.00 |
Territoire et développement endogène au Sud
Président de séance:
|
| 17.00-19.00 |
|
| 3 jour | samedi 5 octobre |
|---|---|
| 9.00-10.45 |
Le territoire au cœur du renouvellement de l’action économique et des politiques publiques
|
| 10.45-11.00 |
Pausa Caffè |
| 11.00-13.00 |
|
Coimbra, 21–22 ottobre 2011
Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra.
Av. Dias da Silva, 165
| Venerdì 21 ottobre | |
|---|---|
| Mattino | |
|
|
| Indebitamento e politiche di stabilizzazione | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Pomeriggio | |
| Lavoro e produttività | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sabato 22 ottobre | |
|---|---|
| Mattino | |
| Innovazione e politiche industriali. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convegno in ricordo di Giorgio Fuà su:
Ancona, 5-6 novembre 2010
| Ora | Venerdì 5 novembre 2010 Facoltà di Economia “G. Fuà”, Piazzale Matelli 8, Ancona |
|---|---|
| 8.30-9.00 |
Accoglienza e registrazione dei partecipanti |
| 9.00-9.30 |
Saluti
|
| 9.30-10.30 |
Interventi Introduttivi
|
| 10.30-11.15 |
Lezione Magistrale
|
| 11.15-11.30 |
Coffee Break |
| 11.30-13.30 |
I problemi dei paesi a “sviluppo tardivo”
|
| 13.30-14.30 |
Pausa pranzo |
| 11.30-13.30 |
Qualità del lavoro, capitale umano e assetti demografici
|
| 16.30-18.30 |
Misure e indicatori del benessere
|
| 20.30 |
Cena |
| Ora | Sabato 6 novembre 2010 ISTAO Villa Favorita Via Zuccarini n. 15 Ancona |
|---|---|
| 8.30-9.00 |
Accoglienza e registrazione dei partecipanti |
| 9.00-9.15 |
Saluti
|
| 9.15-11.15 |
Imprenditorialità e innovazione nel territorio
|
| 11.15-11.30 |
Coffee Break |
| 11.30-13.30 |
Imprenditorialità e sviluppo organizzativo
|
| 13.30-14.30 |
Buffet di commiato |
San Benedetto del Tronto 11 e 12 settembre 2009
Palazzo Vannicola,
Via Mare 220, Porto d’Ascoli
Incontro realizzato con il contributo
della Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Ascoli Piceno
| Ora | Venerdì 11 settembre |
|---|---|
| 9.30-10.30 |
Apertura dei lavori e saluti delle autorità |
| 10.30-14.30 |
Presiede Giuliano Conti
|
| 14.30-16.30 |
Presiede Patrizio Bianchi
|
| 16.30-18.00 |
Presiede Adriano Giannola
|
| Ora | Sabato 12 settembre |
|---|---|
| 9.00-11.00 |
Presiede Paolo Pettenati
|
| 11.00-14.30 |
Presiede Gioacchino Garofoli
|
| 14.30-18.00 |
Presiede Antonio Vazquez-Barquero
|
ENCUENTRO 2008, Bogotá, Colombia
Noviembre 20-21
Con el auspicio de las universidades Central, de La Salle y de los Andes y con el apoyo la universidad EAFIT, se realizará en Bogotá el encuentro anual de la Asociación de Economistas de Lenguas Neolatinas, AELN, sobre el “Desarrollo económico local y regional: modelos y estrategias en Europa y América Latina”.
La AELN es una organización con sede en Italia, de la que hacen parte connotados profesores e investigadores europeos y latinoamericanos. Entre éstos se cuentan algunos de los principales teóricos y promotores de la estrategia de desarrollo económico local, a la que se ha atribuido buena parte del exitoso desarrollo de varias regiones italianas y españolas y que se ha nutrido de experiencias como las de Silicon Valley en los Estados Unidos y más recientemente, de las de localidades y regiones ubicadas diversos países latinoamericanos, asiáticos y europeos.
En el Encuentro anual de la AELN, caracterizado porque cada uno de los expositores se dirige al auditorio en su lengua nativa y sin traducción simultánea, participarán, además de los miembros de la Asociación, profesores de las universidades que auspician el evento y algunos invitados especiales.
El temario de este año incluye ponencias que permitirán hacer una reflexión conceptual y práctica pertinente para orientar los procesos de desarrollo regional y local de los países de los dos continentes representados en el Encuentro.
Objetivo General: Revisar los modelos y estrategias de desarrollo local, particularmente de las que han sido aplicadas en Colombia durante los últimos años en el contexto de la globalización contemporánea y proponer algunas orientaciones para el futuro, a partir de una reflexión sobre los avances conceptuales y las experiencias recientes de desarrollo económico local en países europeos y latinoamericanos.
Objetivos Específicos: Hacer un breve inventario de los avances recientes más destacados en el pensamiento sobre el desarrollo económico local en el marco de la globalización. Examinar algunas experiencias relevantes recientes de desarrollo económico local que han tenido lugar en Europa y en América Latina durante los últimos años. Elaborar algunas propuestas que puedan ser tomadas en consideración en la orientación futura de las políticas y estrategias de desarrollo regional, particularmente en Colombia.
Las aproximaciones al desarrollo desde el ámbito local han venido cobrando especial importancia a partir del proceso de globalización reciente, en el cual dicho ámbito, entendido como lugar y como nodo de una red global, se ha convertido en elemento clave de las transformaciones de la sociedad contemporánea. Esto se corrobora cuando se observan fenómenos como la descentralización o la transnacionalización de múltiples procesos que, desde diversas perspectivas, convergen en lo local.
En estas condiciones, es indudable que cualquier estrategia de desarrollo requiere hoy en día tomar expresamente en consideración este ámbito y el conjunto de los actores sociales que en él actúan. De ello se desprende lo relevante de las reflexiones que para tal efecto pueden llevarse a cabo con el apoyo de personas altamente calificadas.
El Encuentro se llevará a cabo en Bogotá, Colombia, durante los días 20 y 21 de noviembre de 2008, en las sedes de las universidades Central, La Salle y los Andes y cuenta con el apoyo de la Universidad EAFIT de Medellín. La temática tratada y los expositores que la tendrán a cargo se presentan a continuación. Es posible que el programa definitivo registre algunos cambios con respecto al que aquí se incluye.
| Ponencias | Noviembre 20, jueves Lugar: Universidad Central de Colombia, Sala Fundadores, Calle 22 #5-85 |
|---|---|
| 8.00-8.45 |
Instalación: |
|
Tema 1: Los procesos de desarrollo local y regional en la globalización; aspectos de su trayectoria ¿De qué manera está incidiendo la globalización en los procesos de desarrollo local? ¿Corresponde esta incidencia a lo que se percibió en las primeras etapas de la formación de la teoría del desarrollo económico local? ¿Cuál es el tipo de reacciones posibles del entorno local frente a los impactos respectivos? ¿Qué tipo de experiencias concretas y recientes podrían traerse como ejemplo? |
|
| 8.45-9.25 |
Antonio Vásquez Barquero (España), “Desarrollo local en tiempos de globalización”. |
| 9.25-10.05 |
Edgard Moncayo (Colombia), “Impactos territoriales de la globalización: el caso colombiano en perspectiva latinoamericana”. |
| 10.05-10.20 |
Receso |
| 10.20-11.00 |
Víctor Godínez (México), “Globalización y dinámicas regionales. De diferenciación productiva en México” |
| 11.00-12.00 |
Comentarios y preguntas |
|
Moderador: Diego Otero Prada, Decano Facultad de Economía, Universidad Central |
|
| 14.00-14.40 |
Carlos Zorro Sánchez, (Colombia), “Las pequeñas y medianas empresas colombianas frente a la globalización. Aproximación desde la perspectiva del desarrollo económico local”. |
|
Tema 2. La gobernanza del desarrollo local: Experiencias en Europa y América Latina. ¿De qué manera la institucionalidad local (entendida en un sentido amplio) ha venido adecuándose para responder a los desafíos del desarrollo en un contexto de crecientes interdependencias que tienden a desbordar por completo el ámbito de lo local? |
|
| 14.40-15.20 |
Lucía Cusmano (Italia), "Governance e sviluppo locale: esperienze e opportunità di cooperazione tra Europa e America Latina" |
| 15.20-15.35 |
Receso |
| 15.35-16.15 |
Victor Ramiro Fernández, (Argentina), "Más allá del Nuevo Regionalismo. Elementos para una nueva agenda del desarrollo territorial desde la periferia." |
| 16.15-17.30 |
Comentarios, preguntas y debate sobre una nueva agenda de desarrollo territorial |
|
Moderador: Edgard Moncayo Jiménez, Director Centro de Investigación y Estudios de la FCAEC, Universidad Central |
|
| Ponencias | Noviembre 21, viernes Lugar: Universidad de los Andes |
|
|---|---|---|
|
TEMA 3: Modelos de organización territorial de la producción: distritos industriales, sistemas productivos locales, clusters y polos tecnológicos. Modelos de organización territorial de la producción: distritos industriales, sistemas productivos locales, clusters y polos tecnológicos. ¿Cabe hacer un balance de la operación y de los resultados de estas distintas formas de organización de la actividad empresarial en el ámbito local? En caso afirmativo ¿Cuál es ese balance? ¿Qué se desprende en términos de recomendaciones para las empresas? ¿Y en términos de política? |
||
| 8.15-8.55 |
Denis Maillat (Suiza), "Développement local, milieux innovateurs... et après?" |
|
| 8.55-9.35 |
Gioacchino Garofoli, (Italia) "Modelos de organización territorial de la producción y sistemas productivos locales: distritos industriales, clusters y polos tecnológicos" |
|
| 9.35-9.50 |
Receso |
|
| 9.50-10.30 |
Gabi Dei Ottati (Italia), “Azioni collettive ed evoluzione dei distretti industriali”. |
|
| 10.30-11.10 |
Marleny Cardona (Colombia), “Estructuras agrarias y desarrollo regional: tenencia de la tierra, uso del suelo y grupos de interés en Antioquia” |
|
| 11.10-12.00 |
Comentarios y preguntas |
|
|
Moderador: Jaime Rendón, Coordinador Centro Transdisciplinario para la alternatividad al Desarrollo, CTAD, U. de la Salle |
||
| P.M. Lugar: Universidad de la Salle | ||
|
Tema 4: Políticas de Desarrollo Económico Local: Experiencias, pertinencia y especificidades de su aplicación en Colombia y otros países latinoamericanos. Experiencias y reflexiones desde la perspectiva del desarrollo económico local, haciendo énfasis en los países latinoamericanos en general y particularmente en Colombia. ¿Qué tipo de organización se descubre en los sistemas productivos? ¿Tiene sentido la estrategia de desarrollo económico local en localidades que se han mantenido, al menos desde el punto de vista económico, al margen del proceso de globalización contemporánea? ¿Es viable una estrategia de esta naturaleza en regiones altamente conflictivas? ¿Qué especificidades requiere una política de desarrollo económico local en países como los latinoamericanos? |
||
| 14.30-15.10 |
Claude Courlet (Francia), "Territoire et développement économique au Brésil: Systèmes Productifs Localisés et Arrangements Productifs Locaux au Pernambuco". |
|
| 15.10-15.50 |
Jaime Rendón (Colombia), “Territorio e industrialización: el caso de Bogotá” |
|
| 15.50-16.05 |
Receso |
|
| 16.05-16.45 |
Jorge Lotero (Colombia), "El examen del turismo rural mediante los enfoques de cluster y redes institucionales. El caso de dos subregiones de Antioquia, Colombia” |
|
| 16.45-18.00 |
Comentarios, preguntas, debate y conclusiones: Aportes, restricciones y aplicabilidad de la estrategia de Desarrollo Económico Local en América Latina. |
|
|
Moderador: Antonio Vásquez-Barquero, Facultad de Economía, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (España) |
||
| 18.00-18.30 |
Clausura |
|
con il patrocinio di CEPAL e di BNDES
ed il contributo finanziario di Intesa San Paolo,
di SEBRAE - RJ, di Fecomércio - RJ
e dell'Istituto Italiano di Cultura - RJ
Rio de Janeiro, 10-11 settembre 2007
Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social - BNDES
Av. República do Chile, 100 - Centro - 20031-917 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ
| Ora | Lunedì 10 settembre 2007 |
|---|---|
| 9.30-11.00 |
Apertura dei lavori e saluti delle autorità
|
| 11.00-16.00 |
MODELLI E STRATEGIE DI SVILUPPO ECONOMICOPresidente: Prof. Paolo Pettenati (Università Politecnica delle Marche, Italia)
|
| 16.30-18.00 |
UNIVERSITÀ, INDUSTRIA, INNOVAZIONEPresidente: Prof. Denis Maillat (Université de Neuchâtel, Suisse)
|
| Ora | Martedì 11 settembre 2007 |
|---|---|
| 9.30-14.30 |
SISTEMI PRODUTTIVI LOCALIPresidente: Prof. Gioacchino Garofoli (Università dell'Insubria, Italia)
|
| 14.30-18.00 |
IDE, NETWORK DI IMPRESE E DIVISIONE INTERNAZIONALE DEL LAVOROPresidente: Prof. Wilson Suzigan (UNICAMP, Brasil)Charles-Albert MICHALET [key speaker] [Université Paris Dauphine, France] Roberto PASCA DI MAGLIANO [Università "La Sapienza" Italia] Isaac MINIAN [Universidar Nacional Autonoma de México] Giorgio GALEAZZI [Università di Macerata, Italia], Francesca SPIGARELLI [Università di Macerata, Italia], Federico BOFFA [Università di Bolzano, Italia] Giovanni BALCET [Università di Torino, Italia], Flávia CONSONI [University of São Paulo, Brasil] |
| 18.00 |
Presentazione del libro di José Reis (Universidade de Coimbra) "Ensaios de Economia Impura", Almedina, Coimbra e del libro di Allen J. Scott e Gioacchino Garofoli "Development on the ground Clusters, networks and regions in emerging economies", Routledge, London and New York. |
Chambery, 12 luglio 2007, ore 11.00
Centre de Congrès "Le Manège", 331 Rue de La République
Alghero (Sardegna, Italia)
20 e 21 ottobre 2006
Hotel Oasis, Viale 1o Maggio, Alghero
| Ora | VENERDÌ 20 OTTOBRE 2006 |
|---|---|
| 9.30-13.00 |
LO SVILUPPO ECONOMICO NEI PAESI DEL MEDITERRANEORelazioni:
|
| 14.30-18.00 |
PATTERNS E STRATEGIE DI SVILUPPO: UNA RIVISITAZIONE TEORICARelazioni:
|
| Ora | SABATO 21 OTTOBRE 2006 |
|---|---|
| 9.30-13.00 |
STRUTTURA ECONOMICA E TRASFORMAZIONE IN AMERICA LATINARelazioni:
|
Camera di Commercio di Sassari
con la collaborazione del CRIEL
e del Master LED dell'Università dell'Insubria
(Alghero, 16-19 ottobre 2006)
La Workshop sullo sviluppo economico locale sarà indirizzata agli attori (pubblici e privati) dello sviluppo locale di diverse aree nel bacino del Mediterraneo, per facilitare l'interscambio di esperienze e per promuovere la diffusione delle "best practices". Questa esperienza formativa ha lo scopo di favorire la comparazione di diversi modelli di "governance" dello sviluppo locale per evidenziare la diversa capacità (e i diversi strumenti e percorsi utilizzati) di risolvere i problemi dell'economia e della società locale da parte delle organizzazioni pubbliche e private e di favorire la crescita della cultura della comparazione internazionale. Ciò faciliterà anche il perseguimento di un obiettivo secondario (in relazione all'evento), nonostante la sua grande rilevanza, che è quello dell'organizzazione di una vera e propria rete internazionale di territori per il sostegno dello sviluppo locale. Gli utenti della Workshop saranno utenti attivi perché dovranno intervenire per raccontare la loro esperienza e mostrare problemi e modalità utilizzate per affrontarli nelle varie aree che saranno rappresentate. Per facilitare la presentazione dei vari casi locali, si è pensato che sia opportuno che ciascuno intervenga nella propria lingua, selezionando partecipanti che utilizzano le lingue neolatine, ripetendo una iniziativa già organizzata con successo a Caltagirone nel dicembre 2003.
(sono indicati i nomi dei relatori proposti, che in parte devono essere ancora contattati; saranno poi invitati studiosi e rappresentanti delle istituzioni a presentare relazioni e interventi su casi concreti nei vari paesi del Mediterraneo) (i relatori svolgeranno il ruolo d apertura delle tematiche per dar modo di far discutere poi gli operatori economici e sociali coinvolti nei progetti specifici)
Lo sviluppo economico locale: modelli e strategie. Una presentazione delle opportunità per lo sviluppo endogeno e "bottom up"
Relatori proposti: Antonio Vazquez Barquero (Universidad Autonoma de Madrid), Claude Courlet (Università Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble), Mario Pezzini (OCSE, Paris), Gioacchino Garofoli (Università dell'Insubria)
Struttura economica regionale: somiglianze e differenze nel Mediterraneo
Strumenti e strategie di sviluppo locale nel Mediterraneo: le esperienze concrete
I diversi livelli di governo nelle strategie di sviluppo locale
Venerdì 20 e Sabato 21 si terrà il Convegno dell'Associazione degli Economisti di Lingua Neolatina sul tema "Lo sviluppo economico delle regioni del Mediterraneo: problemi e prospettive". Per informazioni e iscrizioni al workshop: Ufficio AL.FOR. Università dell'Insubria (0332/221612) (e-mail: dmilani@eco.uninsubria.it)
